Skeptic Criticism

I am very aware of the common criticisms and ‘explanations’ for homeopathy given by skeptics:

“When homeopathy is subjected to scrutiny using the scientific method it is found wanting because it lacks a plausible mechanism by which it might work, there is no convincing evidence for its key concept the memory of water, in high quality trials it is found to act no better than a placebo and the personal anecdotes and case studies cited in support are more easily explained by various cognitive biases, error or fraud than by homeopathy.”

I encourage more scientists to become involved in homeopathy research [see Homeopathy Myths] in line with homeopathic philosophy but realise that such endeavours may affect their reputation.


TrackBack URI

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: